CFFFL Superbowl

Started by MURP, December 19, 2006, 09:53:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

QB Eagles

Yeah, because our league was so large, we had people starting RBs that weren't even getting that many carries, as well as some bigtime scrubs in the WR and QB categories. Would have been even nastier if teams would have had more ability to hoard. We could have easily had more than 32 QBs on teams. I'm all for forcing everyone to make tough decisions and giving the shteintier (or unluckier injury-wise) drafting teams an outside chance of rebuilding during the season.

Father Demon

I must be in the minority.  I would like to see less roster spots, allowing for maybe 2 bench spots, one less WR, and going back to team defense instead of naming 3 starters. 

The less WR and less bench spots would force people to think about moves rather than just doingthem, and would also allow for quality players out on the wire.

But that's just me.
The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

hbionic

I'm in for the next season....I'll try waking up at 6am...but if it can pacific time friendly...then all the better.  :evil
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


Sgt PSN

Chuggie, the draft shouldn't be too hard for you next year.  We did a live draft this year on Yahoo and it was over in about an hour or so.  I think we did it on a weekend too so it shouldn't interfere with work.  And even if it does you can always pre-rank your players and let the computer auto draft for you. 

hbionic

Why are you being so nice. I was expecting a half-ass remark by you. I'm disappointed.
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


Sgt PSN

Eat shtein you pole smoking, mexican fruit topping. 

Rome