2006 fantasy football who to start thread

Started by ice grillin you, September 01, 2006, 12:31:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MDS

pick 2:
larry fitz (coming off injury, who knows how much he'll play)
d branch
punk ass chris henry

also:
ah green been effective but going against good minny run d
have washington and mj drew.

leaning towards green, but im ascared of the run d
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

mpmcgraw


PoopyfaceMcGee


Diomedes

There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

Sgt PSN

#229
Nothing to do with who to start but I just wanted to point out that my opponent in my money league had Palmer, LT, Ocho Cinco and Stallworth in his lineup against me this weekend.  It doesn't even matter who else he had because that's about all he needed.  My team scored 108 points and I'm still losing by 91 points. 

Oh, and he's still got Steve Smith going tonight.  By my calculations, if he fumbles 46 times and has no positive yards I'll win by 1 point.   

SunMo

i outsmarted myself this weekend by benching Chad Johson and Rex Grossman in favor of John Kitna and Mike Furrey....i still won, but i don't like having more points on my bench than my starting lineup scored.
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

SunMo

analyze this trade for me....

i get:
Rudi Johnson
Devery Henderson

i give up:
Marques Colston
Edge James
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: SunMo on November 13, 2006, 05:23:07 PM
analyze this trade for me....

i get:
Rudi Johnson
Devery Henderson

i give up:
Marques Colston
Edge James

Arizona faces some questionable rushing D's over the upcoming weeks.  I don't like that deal at all.

MDS

Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

SunMo

they've faced some questionable running defenses already and have done nothing.  edge is not the major part of this deal, Colston is, basically Colston for Rudi
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

Sgt PSN

Quote from: SunMo on November 13, 2006, 08:52:15 PM
they've faced some questionable running defenses already and have done nothing. edge is not the major part of this deal, Colston is, basically Colston for Rudi

Very true but I think Edge has bigger fantasy 'potential' than Henderson.

That said, what recievers do you currently have on your roster?  If you give up Colston, do you have another reciever to plug in his spot who could provide similar numbers?  If so, then I say make the trade.  Johnson is one of the better fantasy backs in the league and would be a significant upgrade over Edge. 

SunMo

my receivers:  Boldin, Stallworth, Branch

which is why i thought i could give up Colston
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

Sgt PSN

If you're only playing 2 recievers then I'd take a stab at that trade then.  Or maybe a counter offer with either Stallworth or Branch. 

Stallworth is a fantasy dream/nightmare at the same time.  When he's been on the field, he's put up awesome #'s.  But, as we know, he's missed a bunch of games too and there's no telling if he'll miss any more time or not.  He may be good fantasy bait right now after his perfomance on Sunday. 

PoopyfaceMcGee

This weakens your team overall, so I like it.

Tomahawk

Quote from: SunMo on November 14, 2006, 08:24:30 AM
my receivers:  Boldin, Stallworth, Branch

which is why i thought i could give up Colston

Is this league through Yahoo? If so, you'd be insane to trade Colston since he can be played as a TE. If not, I still probaly wouldn't do it unless the RB corps is absolutely horrible.